Photo Justice: Top 5 Tools for Stock Photographers to Combat Infringement and Potentially Earn

Today I was reading Ian Murray’s Geographyphotos blog, where he reports on his 88,000 Alamy-exclusive portfolio July earnings and noticed something interesting. Ian earns more than 3x going after infrigements, with the help of four copyright enforcement companies, than actual royalties from licensing his images.

In a time when there is widespread image theft while royalties, on average, are depressed, I must beg to wonder whether Ian is onto something as a viable business model. Let’s discuss!

How widespread is copyright theft?

You just need to browse for five minutes at Shutterstock to begin spotting some of the literally thousands of stolen images by hundreds of contributors. One hallmark is the same image popping up in multiple accounts – how their software doesn’t detect similars is beyond me.

Keep up the great work, Antonio Gravante!

Antonio Gravante is doing a great job of tracking and helping Shutterstock “wack those moles” using the DCMA mechanism. The problem is that new ones pop up.

Link to thread at the MSG Forum

This problem isn’t isolated to just Shutterstock. Anyway, I don’t want to discuss any futher Shutterstock. It’s been 5 years since I went after thieves and there has been little progress.

Which Copyright Enforcement Companies does Ian Use?

On his blog, Ian mentions that he uses four different copyright enforcement companies which use reverse image search technology to find matches with your images in use on the internet. I’ve outlined their key features below:

ServicePricingCommission-Based RecoveryKey Features
PixsyFree plan available; paid plans starting at $19/month50% of recovered claimsAdvanced image recognition, legal assistance for claims
Copytrack*Free to start30%-50% of recovered claimsComprehensive service, user-friendly platform, no upfront costs
Visual Rights GroupMembership fee: $100 to $500/year30%-40% of recovered claimsMonitoring, legal services, annual membership for extensive support
Copyright AgentSubscription plans starting at €49/month20%-50% of recovered claimsAutomated monitoring, claim management platform, legal support
Pursuing infrigements yourself via the Money Claims Service (UK only)Free100% of recovered claimsMore administration

*NOT RECOMMENDED DUE TO UNPROFESSIONAL AND LIKELY UNLAWFUL BUSINESSES PRACTICES – SEE BLOG POST HERE WHERE THEY ARE DEMANDING ME MONEY!

Don’t bother tracking microstock images for infrigements

I’m afraid that going after infrigements from images uploaded to microstock agencies is fruitless. From experience, they’re usually stolen by small-time thieves based in south Asia which are practically impossible to track and trace.

Then there’s the issue that Royalty-Free licences terms are so broad, combined with multiple agencies with some that offer unlimited downloads that you’ll lose too much time with little guarantee of compensation.

These agencies want to go after the big fish

I don’t even think that these agencies listed above would go after them as just not worth it for them. They want to go after the big fish, i.e. corportations with deep pockets.

Therefore, if you do consider using one or more of the above services it would be recommended that you’re an exclusive contributor at a non-microstock agency, such as Ian is at Alamy.

In my case I could potentially try out these services

In my case, I could begin tracking my 500+ images that I have exclusively via Robert Harding (I have spoken with a Robert Harding contributor who has successfully pursued many claims) as well as my 4,500 images that I have exclusively at Arcangel as Rights-Managed. I also have some 3,000 exclusive images at Alamy. I can’t rely on these agencies to go after the thieves themselves as perhaps they don’t have the adequate time/resources, although I have read that Alamy has paid out contributors on infrigements that they’ve succesfully attacked.

How much can you earn, on average?

Tracking infrigements takes time as it usually means, once an image is identified, giving the opportunity for the defendant to provide evidence of the correct use of license. Many letters back and forth. Then there’s a chance to offer an early settlement where they may purchase the correct license. If those options don’t work then more time will be consumed pursuing the claim in small claim courts. In total the whole process may take many months with no guarantee of settlement/payment.

Using Ian’s efforts as an example

Supposing that you do get paid, how much can you expect to earn, on average? Well it depends. Ian doesn’t publish his earnings results every month and when he does he rarely discusses payments from infrigements. In his blog post he mentioned:

“I received 4 payments from different sources during July for a total of £1313. I had payments from Pixsy, Copytrack, Visual Rights. Also, an out of court settlement for one I pursued myself through the Money Claim system. This was after one of the above mentioned had closed the case after being to unable reach settlement. The Money Claim system is an amazing resource for photographers – even large corporates can be made to pay up.”

I don’t know whether the ~$1,500 net earned is average or not but supposing that it’s an average month then it may be wortwhile for the average contributor with let’s say 10,000 images (such as myself) to earn some $300-400/month. Not bad and the agencies are doing most of the work. I’ll certainly discuss this “additional revenue option” in more detail if I do sign up to those above-mentioned companies.

In the meantime, if anybody reading this could give some insight on their own experiences it would be great – until next time!


About Alex

I’m an eccentric guy, currently based in Lisbon, Portugal on a quest to visit all corners of the world and capture stock images & footage. I’ve devoted ten years to making it as a travel photographer / videographer and freelance writer. I hope to inspire others by showing an unique insight into a fascinating business model while shaming scammers.

I’ve gone all in on submitting book cover images to Arcangel Images. Oh and was also flying a DJI Mavic 2s drone regularly (although it crashed into Botafogo Bay on NYE – here is the story), which I’ve upgraded to a Mini 3 Pro and the Air3.

I’m proud to have written a book about my adventures which includes tips on making it as a stock travel photographer – Brutally Honest Guide to Microstock Photography

5 comments

  1. Alex, I believe Ian stopped being exclusive at Alamy a while ago. But I think he doesn’t submit to microstock sites. At least, not directly.

    Like

  2. Great info Alex. I was aware of pixy but not the others.

    Alamy will chase down infringements for images with them exclusively as long as the use is by someone they can collect from. I found my image and several others in a book published by a US publisher about a year or so ago, notified Alamy, and eventually they recovered $250 instead of the $75 that it would have cost. It took a year and it showed up a few times as $75 then $250 then minus -$250 then + $250 and minus $75 and I got my 40% after all this back and forth. I think Alamy requires you to request that they pursue it first.

    In this case the image was credited to me/Alamy but 6 months or more after the book was published I hadn’t been credited for a sale. So I contacted Alamy. I don’t know if my image was an oversight or if they were chasing down others in the book too.

    I’ve had others where they said there was no hope of collecting. It’s an uphill battle.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.